I actually (speed)read the book and I have to say that I find this concept of creating a hedonistic utopia based on left hand path principles yet also with love is a very interesting idea. I do have a few questions:
English is the primary language we use in the future for eternity. [p.8]”
Could you please explain this? In what way is English a language that holds for eternity.
Black Magick is knowing that it is not impossible to obtain your desires. Black Magick is manifesting your desires with your mind’s abilities. Black Magick is to be practiced with moral maturity.”[p.12]
Character of Pure Hedonistic Vigilance: *Hedonist [...] Perfect Moral Integrity [...][p.71]
There is an inherent inconsistency in your ideology. Hedonism supposes the (immediate) gratification of ones personally desires, however moral action and moral integrity supposes self constrain. Let me give an example. Lets suppose that you are at a party and a girl is trying to hook up with you. You know she is not into you and you know that she is married as well. But now that she is drunk she is offering herself to you. If you desire her as well then hedonism would allows you to have sex with her, however is it also moral to do so if you consider the fact that she is not in a state to rationally think and that this action will cause her to have major problems.
A's you practice magick you may come to understand Black Technology(Highly Advanced Mechanics/ Computers/Machines/Necessary Technology for Development of Humanity or Other/More) and Black Magick(Magick that suits your needs as divinely learned or comprehended(It must be logically proved).[p.33]
Another fundamental problem which pops up over and over again is that logical proving thing. Just because something seems logical doesn't necessary mean it is also true. Let me give an example:
Premise 1: All dutch people are tall
Premise 2: I am dutch
Conclusion: I am tall
This is logical however it doesn't coinside with reality
A lot of your reasoning is based on this. At least that is what you seem to be suggesting. I would question your reasoning skills in the first place that that is a different matter.
You need a perfect balance between the hypotheticals ‘I may be alone in existence’ and ‘Existence is a paradox so there could be others’. This balance keeps your mind logical. Consider until you can PROVE physics.” [p.43]
This would be an example of why I question your reasoning skills as there is no sensible line of thought here and leads to no conclusion:
Premise 1: 'I may be alone in existence'
Premise 2: 'Existence is a paradox so there could be others'
Premise 3: You need a perfect balance between the hypotheticals
Premise 4: This balance keeps your mind logical
Conclusion: PROVE of physics
The correct conclusion would be something like: I may not be alone in the universe and this idea keeps the mind logical.
“Never be sympathetic to False People. If you suspect someone may not have a perception don’t share any sympathy with them for they have not always existed, and your loyalty is to your sisters[Gods] that have always existed.” [p.48]
It is interesting because you claim love and moral integrity as a goal of your ideology however it seems like that at the same time you are saying that only those who share your perception deserve your loyalty. You also claim the importance of pursuing pure knowledge as a goal, however it seems like you are purposing an echochamber mentality where only people who share your views deserve your loyalty (and I assume your attention as well). It will result in a recycling of the same ideas instead of generating pure knowledge.
That Futanari’s are the only compatible bodies for us to have, it allows love, romance, sexuality, philosophy, conversation, compatibility, enjoyment, comfort and absolute forgiveness [...] The Futanari have a dick and a vagina simultaneously. Their dicks are almost always erect or always erect, and the Futanari are very playful sexually(LOVE).
I am very curious about how one gets a body like that according to your logic.